By JC - (Religious Freedom) - My
form of teenage rebellion was refusing to say the Pledge of Allegiance in
middle school. I was fighting against
authority; I was sticking it to the man.
I was different. Some teachers
were amused by this act of mine. Others
became agitated and upset, demanding to know why I wouldn’t stand up and say
the pledge. Like a smart ass, I would
answer: “I feel uncomfortable because ‘under God’ violates my religious
beliefs.” Looking back, I now know that
my teenage naiveté trivialized an issue of enormous importance.
The
United States prides itself on being a progressive champion of religious
freedom. We shame Syria and China for
their backwards practices; we are virtuous, and we are different. We don’t privilege any religions above
others; everyone is equal in America.
But we’re not. We’re really not.
American
society inherently privileges Christianity above all other religions. This extends far beyond the Pledge of
Allegiance; Christian privilege is built into the fabric of our society. All currency is stamped with “In God We
Trust.” The national anthem is filled
with overt religious language and is performed at public sporting events and
other public gatherings. Presidents are generally
sworn into office with a Bible. The Ten
Commandments are displayed on various public buildings—including the Supreme
Court. Teachers can hang scriptures and
other religious paraphernalia in classrooms.
Christmas is a federal holiday.
These
examples form just the tip of the iceberg; by making Christianity the default
religion, we are othering non-Christian
religions. By assuming Christianity
unless told otherwise, we are subconsciously categorizing non-Christians as
outsiders and add-ons to American society.
Sure, all religions are welcome in America—we’re a melting pot. But if you’re different, then you have to
know that you’re different. Everyone
will know that you’re different.
A
recent Gallup poll found that over 75% of American adults identify with a
Christian religion. Many will argue what’s
the problem if the numbers make sense? From
a philosophical perspective, we undermine the notion of human equality when we
allow a majority to be privileged over minorities. Our country was founded on Locke’s ideas of
natural rights and equality. Yet, we
have historically undermined these ideals by allowing different types of
privilege to permeate society—ranging from white privilege to straight
privilege to Christian privilege. We
tread close to Tocqueville’s tyranny of the majority here.
Moreover,
this type of systemic privilege can have long lasting consequences. For example, the power dynamic can inflict
psychological damage on minority groups, lowering their sense of self-worth and
marking them as outsiders. Are people
truly free if having different religious beliefs automatically casts them as
outsiders? If they are excluded or
non-deserving of certain privileges? If
they may feel uncomfortable in public settings?
As
a nation, we celebrate uniqueness and diversity; and yet, our practices and institutions
reinforce standards and norms that are exclusionary to people who are
different. The First Amendment states
that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
Yes, most of the aforementioned religious practices have not violated
the Constitution. Congress will mostly
likely never establish a national religion, and we are generally free to
practice any religion of our choice. But
freedom of religion is more than free exercise of religion—it relates to
factors impacting our exploration of religion and choices surrounding our ultimate
religious expression.
Establishing
freedom of religion will require conscious acknowledgement of religious
privileges in our society and active efforts to counteract them. Suppose I read the Qur’an and find that it
deeply resonates with me. Do I convert
to Islam? Legally I am allowed to do as
I wish. However, perhaps I am a teacher
and parents on the PTA would be outraged.
Perhaps I’m afraid to become the target of a hate crime. Or perhaps I’m just uncomfortable being
different. I am not truly free to explore
or express my religious beliefs.
In
today’s society, people hate acknowledging privilege. We enjoy privilege, but there is something
shameful about recognizing it or attributing success to it. However, freedom of religion is not a zero-sum
game. Acknowledging Christian privilege
and becoming more secular in the public sphere will not detract from
Christians’ freedom of religion—it will just add to that of others’. So next time we say the Pledge of Allegiance,
we might want to examine out own privileges—or lack thereof.
No comments:
Post a Comment